The US Department of Justice (DoJ) has released a 23-page document calling for the breakup of Google, including a sale of the Chrome web browser and restrictions on Android, confirming previous reports. Selling Chrome “will permanently stop Google’s control of this critical search access point and allow rival search engines the ability to access the browser that for many users is a gateway to the internet,” DoJ lawyers argued in the filing.
The regulator said that Google must also stop favoring its own search engine in Android. If the company fails to do that, DoJ lawyers argued that it should also be required to divest its mobile device operating system. They also proposed that Google syndicate search results separately and sell its click and query data to aid rival search engines and AI startups.
In a response on its Keyword blog, Google said the DoJ’s “staggering proposal” would harm consumers and affect US tech leadership. “[The] DoJ chose to push a radical interventionist agenda that would harm Americans and America’s global leadership,” wrote Global Affairs president and chief legal officer, Kent Walker. “DoJ’s wildly overbroad proposal goes miles beyond the Court’s decision. It would break a range of Google products — even beyond Search — that people love and find helpful in their everyday lives.”
All of this started back in 2020, when the DoJ and multiple states filed a lawsuit arguing that Google paid billions to device manufacturers to secure default status for its search engine. Then in August this year, federal judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google “is a monopolist” in the industry and used its power to charge “supracompetitive prices for general search text ads.” (As of last year, Google controlled around 90 percent of the search engine market, processing nearly 9 billion searches per day.)
The DoJ’s proposals to breakup Google are based on that ruling, but the makeup and philosophy of the department is likely to change drastically in a Trump administration. Indeed, Google’s Keyword blog seems to be aimed directly at the incoming president, invoking dangers to security, required disclosure to foreign companies and the mandating of “government micromanagement.” Recently, Trump himself weighed in on the matter, suggesting a breakup might be too drastic. “What you can do without breaking it up is make sure it’s more fair,” he said last month.
All of this is still at an early stage, with many court cases and appeals likely to come. Still, it would represent a seismic shift in how Google, a company with 182,500 employees, does business. More importantly, it could drastically affect how the internet works, as over 60 percent of web interactions start with a search query — and most of those are done using Google search.
